ID 1111:

Thorough work, using all basic distance measures. The results are reported, yet not commented. What's missing is 
a) a statement if the approach is strong enough
b) a statement if the results are in the expected range
c) analysis, or assumptions why the algorithm is too weak.

However, a lot of good work was done, please don't forget to harvest knowledge (=analysis) from all the results!

Score: 9 points

------------------------------------------------


ID 3286:

(report only)

Very professional selection of distances (with reference to Haibin Ling's paper), sufficient analysis.

Score: 10 points.

------------------------------------------------

ID 2013:

Good work with sufficient analysis, the report is a little short though - yet it covers the basics.

Score: 10

------------------------------------------------

ID 1683:

A thorough work, code is ok, basic distance measures are implemented. However, an analysis is missing, yet there is a statement about the performance, with a reasonable suggestion about reasons for the quality of performance.

Score 9 points.

------------------------------------------------


ID 1674:

A thorough work, code is ok, basic distance measures are implemented. However, an analysis is missing, yet there is a statement about the performance, with a reasonable suggestion about reasons for the quality of performance.

Score 9 points.

-------------------------------------------------

ID 5871:

Thorough work, using all basic distance measures. The results are reported, yet not commented. What's missing is 
a) a statement if the approach is strong enough
b) a statement if the results are in the expected range
c) analysis, or assumptions why the algorithm is too weak.

However, a lot of good work was done, please don't forget to harvest knowledge (=analysis) from all the results!

Score: 9 points

--------------------------------------------------

ID 1424:

Thorough work with a very detailed report (+1 point). Unfortunately there's no analysis of the results, but only a description how they were achieved (-1 point).

A little remarks: The distance is called 'Minkowski Distance', there's a typo in your report. 

Score: 10 points

--------------------------------------------------

ID 4286:

Thorough work with a very detailed report (+1 point), and a sufficient analysis of the results.

Score: 11 points.

-------------------------------------------------